Collecting New Mexico agriculture, acequia & farming books — the literature of a distinctive agricultural tradition

Last verified May 2026 · Original research by Josh Eldred

Why a New Mexico agriculture and acequia reference

Agriculture & Acequia Farming Books Worth Collecting — New books, including Mayordomo: Chronicle of an Acequia in Northern New Mexico (1988), are sought-after collectibles commanding. New Mexico’s agricultural literature occupies a peculiar position among American regional farming canons. Most states have agricultural literatures built around a single dominant crop or production system — Iowa corn, California wine, Georgia cotton, Vermont maple. New Mexico has instead a layered, multi-tradition agricultural record in which at least five distinct farming systems coexist in a single landscape: Pueblo irrigated agriculture predating European contact; Hispano acequia-based subsistence farming introduced in the sixteenth century; Anglo dryland homestead farming of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries; the modern irrigated commercial agriculture of the southern Rio Grande valley (dominated by the chile and pecan industries); and the late-twentieth-century revival of small-scale organic and traditional agriculture in the northern valleys. Each tradition has produced its own literature, its own key texts, and its own institutional base.

The reason this layered record matters to a book collector or a regional literacy project is that the five traditions map onto five different publication channels, five different survival rates in the secondary market, and five different institutional homes. The acequia memoir and scholarly literature is concentrated at UNM Press and SAR Press and survives well in hardcover. The Hispano subsistence-agriculture record is largely preserved through UNM Press reissues of mid-twentieth-century texts by Cabeza de Baca and Jaramillo. The Pueblo agricultural record is scattered across anthropological monographs, museum bulletins, and Bureau of American Ethnology reports. The chile-industry literature is split between popular trade books and NMSU extension bulletins. And the dryland-farming and soil-conservation record is almost entirely in government documents — Soil Conservation Service reports, CCC project records, county-extension bulletins — the category of agricultural ephemera most aggressively discarded by chain thrifts and estate cleanouts.

This pillar walks each tradition in rough chronological order, identifies the central titles, names the key authors and publishers, and explains where a donated New Mexico agriculture book actually belongs in 2026. The page is part of the regional-book-donation moat that NMLP is building across central New Mexico.

Pueblo agriculture and the Three Sisters

The oldest agricultural tradition in the New Mexico landscape is Pueblo farming, which by the time of European contact in 1540 had been practiced continuously for over a thousand years along the Rio Grande and its tributaries. The agricultural foundation was the Three Sisters — corn (Zea mays), beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), and squash (Cucurbita spp.) — interplanted in the same field in a polyculture system of remarkable ecological efficiency. The corn stalk serves as a trellis for the bean vine; the bean plant fixes atmospheric nitrogen in root nodules, enriching the soil for the corn; the broad squash leaves shade the ground, suppressing weeds and retaining soil moisture in the arid southwestern environment. To the Three Sisters the Pueblo farmers added cotton, tobacco, sunflowers, and a variety of wild-harvested plants that supplemented the cultivated crop base.

The European documentary record of Pueblo agriculture begins with the Coronado expedition of 1540–1542. Pedro de Castañeda de Nájera’s Relación de la Jornada de Cíbola — the most detailed surviving narrative of the expedition — describes irrigated Pueblo fields along the Rio Grande producing corn, beans, and squash in quantities sufficient to provision the entire expeditionary force. Hernando de Alvarado’s reconnaissance reports from the Tiguex pueblos near modern Bernalillo document functioning irrigation infrastructure that the Spanish recognized as analogous to the acequia systems they knew from Iberia and central Mexico. The Pueblo irrigation systems predated the Spanish acequias by centuries; the Spanish contribution was the legal and organizational framework that would later be codified in colonial and territorial water law.

Florence Hawley Ellis (1906–1991) is the twentieth-century anthropologist most closely associated with the sustained academic documentation of Pueblo agricultural practices. Working from the University of New Mexico Department of Anthropology from the 1930s through the 1980s, Ellis produced archaeological and ethnographic studies of Pueblo farming at multiple Rio Grande and western pueblos. Her work is published primarily in academic journals (American Antiquity, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology) and museum monographs rather than in trade books, which means the print record is scattered and surfaces in donation piles primarily as academic offprints and bound-journal runs rather than as standalone volumes.

For the collector, the Pueblo agriculture record presents a characteristic difficulty: the most authoritative twentieth-century treatments are in anthropological monographs, museum bulletins (particularly the Bureau of American Ethnology Annual Reports and Bulletins, and the Museum of New Mexico Papers in Anthropology series), and university-press volumes that were printed in small runs and bound in soft covers. The Three Sisters concept has entered popular agricultural literature widely — every contemporary sustainable-agriculture handbook mentions it — but the specific New Mexico Pueblo documentation is in formats that do not survive well in the secondary market.

The acequia system — from colonial irrigation to constitutional protection

The word acequia derives from the Arabic as-sāqiya (the water carrier), a linguistic trace of the Moorish irrigation engineering that Spanish colonists brought to the Americas. The first documented acequias in the New Mexico territory were constructed at the San Gabriel de Yuñge-Ouinge settlement (near modern Ojó Caliente) by Juan de Oñate’s colonists in 1598. By the time of the Pueblo Revolt of 1680, functioning acequia systems were operating along the Rio Grande from the Taos valley south to below Albuquerque. After the Reconquest of 1692–93, the acequia infrastructure was rebuilt and expanded under a Spanish colonial water-law regime that treated water as a communal resource allocated to agricultural use by the community, not as private property.

The legal framework matters to the book collector because it is the institutional foundation on which the entire acequia literature rests. Under Spanish and then Mexican law, acequia water belonged to the community of irrigators (parciantes), and the annual governance of each acequia was administered by a mayordomo (ditch boss) elected by the parciantes. When the United States acquired New Mexico through the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, the territorial and then state legal system faced the problem of reconciling Anglo-American prior-appropriation water law with the existing communal water-rights system. The result was a series of legal protections unique in American water law: Article XVI of the New Mexico Constitution addresses water rights and irrigation; the 2009 Acequia Governance Act (NM Statutes § 73-3-1 et seq.) gives acequia associations the statutory authority to approve or deny transfers of water rights out of the acequia — a power that effectively allows the community to block the sale of agricultural water to urban and industrial users. There are approximately 700 active acequias in New Mexico today, most in the northern part of the state along the Rio Grande and its tributaries from Taos to Albuquerque.

This legal and institutional distinctiveness is what makes the New Mexico acequia literature a coherent book-collecting category rather than merely a subset of the broader American irrigation literature. The books are about a particular kind of community, not merely a particular kind of ditch.

Stanley Crawford — the acequia memoir

Stanley Crawford (born 1937) is a novelist and farmer who has lived in the Embudo valley near Dixon, New Mexico, since the late 1960s. He is the writer most closely identified with the literary acequia tradition and the author of the two books that, taken together, constitute the canonical English-language account of small-scale northern New Mexico farming.

Crawford’s other novels set in the Dixon area — Log of the S.S. The Mrs. Unguentine (1972), Some Instructions (2002), The River in Winter (2003) — are not agricultural literature per se but share the northern New Mexico landscape and the small-farming social milieu. A Crawford collection on the agricultural shelf would include all of them.

The acequia scholarship — Arellano, Rodriguez, Rivera

Between 1998 and 2014, three scholars produced the books that transformed the acequia from a subject of memoir and legal analysis into a fully theorized field of southwestern cultural studies. Taken together, the three volumes constitute the scholarly foundation of acequia studies.

The three books form a natural shelf: Rivera provides the legal and institutional framework, Rodriguez provides the anthropological and spiritual analysis, Arellano provides the personal and historical synthesis. A collector who has all three plus Crawford’s Mayordomo has the core of the New Mexico acequia library.

Hispano subsistence agriculture — Cabeza de Baca and Jaramillo

Before the acequia memoir became a recognized literary genre in the late twentieth century, the Hispano agricultural experience in New Mexico was documented primarily by two women writers working in the mid-twentieth century: Fabiola Cabeza de Baca Gilbert and Cleofas Martínez Jaramillo. Both were members of prominent Hispano land-grant families; both wrote from direct knowledge of agricultural and domestic traditions that were disappearing as Anglo-American commercial agriculture and federal land management transformed the New Mexico landscape.

The Cabeza de Baca and Jaramillo texts are the hinge between the Pueblo-era agricultural record and the modern acequia-memoir tradition. They document the middle period — the Hispano agricultural economy of the land-grant era — and they do so from inside the tradition, in voices that carry the authority of lived practice.

The Hatch chile industry — DeWitt, Bosland, and the Chile Pepper Institute

No discussion of New Mexico agriculture is complete without the chile pepper, and no crop in the state carries more cultural weight per acre planted. The New Mexico green chile — particularly the cultivars developed at New Mexico State University and associated in the popular imagination with the village of Hatch in Doña Ana County — is simultaneously an agricultural commodity, a culinary identity marker, a state symbol (the official state question, adopted by the legislature in 1999, is “Red or green?”), and the subject of a substantial popular and scientific bibliography.

The scientific foundation was laid by Fabian Garcia (1871–1948), a horticulturist at the New Mexico College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts (now NMSU) who in 1894 began the systematic breeding program that would produce the standardized New Mexico chile cultivars. Garcia’s breeding work, published primarily in NMSU Agricultural Experiment Station bulletins, created the New Mexico 9 chile that became the commercial standard for the early and mid-twentieth-century industry. His successors at NMSU — Roy Nakayama in the 1970s and 1980s, and Paul Bosland from 1986 forward — continued the breeding program and produced the cultivars that dominate the contemporary market, including NuMex Big Jim (for a time the Guinness world-record holder for largest chile pepper), NuMex Heritage 6-4, NuMex Joe E. Parker, and the ornamental NuMex Twilight.

Paul Bosland, Regents Professor at NMSU and co-founder of the Chile Pepper Institute (the only international nonprofit research organization devoted to the Capsicum genus), has published extensively in the agricultural-science literature and co-authored several books directed at both professional and popular audiences. The Chile Pepper Institute, based on the NMSU campus in Las Cruces, maintains the world’s largest Capsicum germplasm collection and publishes research bulletins, cultivar guides, and annual reports that are a primary-source category for the collector of NM agricultural literature.

Dave DeWitt (born 1943) is the popular chronicler of the chile pepper world. His bibliography is extensive; the titles most relevant to the New Mexico collector include The Chile Pepper Encyclopedia (New York: William Morrow, 1999), The Complete Chile Pepper Book (with Paul Bosland; Timber Press, 2009), and numerous titles on southwestern cuisine and chile culture published over three decades. DeWitt founded the Chile Pepper magazine (1987–2008) and the National Fiery Foods & Barbecue Show (held annually in Albuquerque since 1988). Back issues of Chile Pepper magazine are an ephemeral but culturally significant collecting category; they surface in estate dispersals and are a format that chain thrifts reliably discard.

The annual Hatch Chile Festival, held on Labor Day weekend, has produced its own ephemera — programs, promotional materials, recipe booklets — that constitutes a micro-category of New Mexico agricultural print culture. The festival and the village of Hatch itself have become so strongly identified with the NM green chile that the legal battles over the “Hatch” name (whether it designates an origin or merely a cultivar type) have themselves generated a legal-studies literature.

Dryland farming, temporal agriculture, and the CCC

East of the Sangre de Cristo mountains, on the high plains and mesas of eastern New Mexico, a different agricultural tradition operated: dryland farming, known in the Hispano tradition as agricultura de temporal (agriculture dependent on the timing of rain rather than on irrigation). The eastern New Mexico homestead boom of 1900–1920 brought thousands of Anglo-American farmers onto the Llano Estacado, the Estancia valley, and the Clovis-Portales corridor, where they attempted to apply midwestern corn-belt farming methods to a landscape receiving twelve to sixteen inches of annual precipitation. The predictable result was the Dust Bowl.

The print record of this experience is concentrated in three categories. First, the homestead-era promotional literature — railroad-company land brochures, territorial immigration-bureau pamphlets, and town-booster publications from Tucumcari, Clovis, Portales, Estancia, and Moriarty — that promised rainfall and agricultural bounty to prospective settlers. This material is genuinely scarce, printed on cheap paper in small runs, and survives primarily in institutional collections (the Center for Southwest Research at UNM, the New Mexico State Records Center and Archives in Santa Fe, and local county-historical-society files). Second, the Dust Bowl and Depression-era literature, including the journalistic and documentary accounts of agricultural failure on the eastern plains. Cabeza de Baca’s I Fed Them Cactus is the canonical literary account of this period from the Hispano perspective. Third, the government documents produced by the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) during the 1930s and 1940s, when federal programs attempted to reverse the erosion damage through terracing, contour plowing, windbreak planting, and the retirement of marginal farmland.

The CCC and SCS records are the most vulnerable category in the New Mexico agricultural print record. Project reports, soil surveys, demonstration-farm bulletins, and county-agent annual reports were printed in government-document format — soft cover, no ISBN, institutional distribution only — and have no secondary-market value in the chain-thrift system. They surface in estate dispersals from families of former county agents, retired NMSU extension staff, and Soil Conservation District board members, and they are exactly the kind of material that gets routed to landfill without examination. NMLP takes all of it.

Not sure what you have? Text me a photo at 702-496-4214 and I'll tell you what I see.

Land-grant farming communities

The Hispano land grants of New Mexico — both community grants (mercedes comunales) and individual grants (mercedes individuales) issued under the Spanish Crown and the Mexican Republic — were fundamentally agricultural institutions. The common lands of a community grant provided pasture, firewood, and timber; the irrigated bottomland strips (suertes or varas) along the acequia provided the cropland. The destruction of the common-land base through the surveying and adjudication processes of the U.S. Court of Private Land Claims (1891–1904) and the subsequent absorption of former grant common lands into the national-forest system is one of the defining grievances of New Mexico political history and the subject of a substantial literature that overlaps with the land-grants collecting pillar.

For the agricultural collector specifically, the relevant titles are those that document the farming and pastoral economy of the grant communities before and during the transition. Malcolm Ebright’s Land Grants and Lawsuits in Northern New Mexico (UNM Press, 1994) and the Center for Land Grant Studies publications provide the legal history. The ethnographic record — the WPA-era Federal Writers’ Project reports on New Mexico villages, the USDA Bureau of Agricultural Economics village surveys of the 1930s and 1940s — documents the actual farming practices of grant communities at the moment they were being transformed by Anglo-American market agriculture. The village-studies literature of the 1970s (the Cañones project directed by Paul Kutsche at Colorado College, the El Cerrito studies) extended the ethnographic documentation into the late-twentieth-century period.

New Mexico wine — from mission viticulture to Gruet

New Mexico claims the oldest winemaking tradition in what is now the United States, and the claim is well-documented. Franciscan missionaries planted the Mission grape (Vitis vinifera var. Criolla) at the earliest Rio Grande missions in the early seventeenth century, decades before Junipero Serra’s Franciscans established the California missions. By the late seventeenth century, Rio Grande valley vineyards were producing sacramental and table wine at missions and haciendas from Socorro north to the Albuquerque area. The Pueblo Revolt of 1680 interrupted production, but the Reconquest saw replanting, and by the early nineteenth century the Perea family of Bernalillo and producers in the Mesilla valley near Las Cruces had established a viable commercial wine industry.

The nineteenth-century NM wine industry peaked in the 1880s, when New Mexico was the fifth-largest wine-producing territory or state in the nation. Decline came through multiple causes: phylloxera (the root louse that devastated vineyards globally), flooding, competition from California, and ultimately Prohibition, which destroyed the remaining commercial operations. The modern revival dates to the 1970s, when the New Mexico Wine Growers Association was organized and new wineries began planting European (Vitis vinifera) varietals on the southern and central Rio Grande corridor.

The anchor of the modern NM wine industry is Gruet Winery, founded in 1984 by the French Gruet family (Gilbert Gruet, a Champagne producer from Bethon, France) near Truth or Consequences and now headquartered in Albuquerque. Gruet’s méthode champenoise sparkling wines brought New Mexico to national wine-industry recognition and demonstrated that the state’s high-altitude, high-UV, low-humidity terroir could produce wines of commercial quality.

The published literature on NM wine is thin compared to the acequia or chile canons. There is no single definitive book equivalent to Crawford’s Mayordomo for acequias or DeWitt’s bibliography for chiles. The record is instead scattered across wine-tourism guides, chapters in broader NM food-and-agriculture histories, NMSU viticulture extension bulletins, and newspaper and magazine journalism. For the collector, this means that the NM wine literature is a frontier category — the books have not yet been written in the density that the subject deserves, and the existing materials are ephemeral and vulnerable to discard.

The New Mexico Farmers’ Market tradition

The modern NM farmers’ market system — anchored by the Santa Fe Farmers Market (one of the oldest continuously operating farmers’ markets in the United States, now housed in the Santa Fe Railyard) and the Albuquerque Downtown Growers’ Market — represents the contemporary institutional expression of the same local-food economy that the acequia system sustained for centuries. The farmers’ markets have generated their own ephemeral print record: vendor guides, seasonal recipe booklets, annual reports, community-supported-agriculture (CSA) directories, and the promotional materials of organizations like the New Mexico Farmers’ Marketing Association and the NM Department of Agriculture’s promotional programs.

This material is not conventionally collected, but it constitutes a documentary record of the contemporary NM agricultural economy that will acquire increasing historical value as the transition from industrial to local food systems proceeds. NMLP takes farmers’-market ephemera in any format.

UNM Press and SAR Press as institutional anchors

The two publishers that dominate the New Mexico agriculture and acequia canon are the University of New Mexico Press in Albuquerque and the School for Advanced Research Press (SAR Press, formerly School of American Research Press) in Santa Fe. Between them, these two presses account for the overwhelming majority of the serious scholarly and literary treatment of NM agricultural traditions in book form.

UNM Press has been the institutional publisher of record for the NM acequia literature since it issued Crawford’s Mayordomo in 1988. The press also maintains the Cabeza de Baca titles in print, published Rivera’s Acequia Culture (1998) and Arellano’s Enduring Acequias (2014), and has produced dozens of related titles in southwestern environmental history, water law, and agricultural anthropology. For the collector, the UNM Press imprint on a New Mexico agriculture title is a reliable signal of scholarly quality and institutional commitment to keeping the title available.

SAR Press operates on a smaller scale and publishes across the full range of southwestern anthropological subjects, of which acequia studies is one strand. Rodriguez’s Acequia: Water Sharing, Sanctity, and Place (2006) is the marquee agricultural title in the SAR catalog. SAR Press print runs are generally smaller than UNM Press, which means SAR titles are less common in the secondary market and may carry a modest premium when they surface.

What to look for — a collector’s checklist

Where these books should go in 2026

The Rio Grande acequia corridor runs straight through Valencia County — Los Lunas, Belen, Tome, and the old land-grant farming communities where acequia agriculture has been continuous for centuries. If you're clearing an estate in that part of the middle valley, my Los Lunas & Valencia County estate cleanout service picks up the full library including the acequia studies, the extension bulletins, and the chile-festival ephemera.

A New Mexico agriculture or acequia book in a donation pile in central New Mexico in 2026 has a clear routing hierarchy. The UNM Press and SAR Press titles in Tiers 1 and 2 are in print, institutionally supported, and can be placed immediately — into the libraries of new farmers, water-law students, acequia commissioners, extension agents, and anyone entering the NM agricultural conversation. The Tier 3 ephemera is where NMLP adds the most value: the NMSU bulletins, the CCC reports, the Chile Pepper back issues, the county-extension materials, and the Pueblo agricultural monographs are the categories that chain thrifts discard without examination and that have no secondary-market price signal to flag their documentary value. NMLP takes every one of them.

The broader principle at work here is the same one that runs through the ethnobotany pillar and the cookbook pillar: the historically most important material in the New Mexico agricultural record is in the formats most likely to be destroyed by the sorting algorithms of the for-profit thrift industry. The agricultural extension bulletin, the government soil survey, the saddle-stitched chile-festival program, the WPA village report — these are the primary sources, and they look like trash to a barcode scanner. NMLP exists, in part, to intercept them.